Republic RBC Walker

Republic Repeating Blaster Cannon Walker - Deadly to infantry, deadly to Jedi. Secretly created for combating Jedi, but was used before Order 66.








Some of you may be skeptical of it's ability to kill a Jedi (COUGHCOUGHTBCOUGHCOUGH), but those frontal cannons fire pretty fucking fast.

Hmmmmmm.

Interesting. I like it all except for the fact that it's shaped too much like the battle pack.

lolz. That's a walker? Looks like the hingese only move side ways. I don't see how it could possible walk. Its more like a stationary defense turret thing...

If I had the pieces it would walk.

But this isn't an elevated turret.

Well, I don't see how it's a walker either. I mean, seriously. Isn't the golden rule of MOCing "Don't build unless you have the pieces for it"?

I don't follow the rules.

Well, by looking at your sig, even a 9-yr old n00b *coughcoughlegoboycoughcough* could tell that. Sorry, I think I've caught swine H1N1 flu.

But in all seriousness, I think you should go down the path of elevated turret. I really think you could pull off a really good one with this as the base.

Pd, unless Alpha is making a stopmotion it's fine. A certain pose can be portrayed with something that wouldn't work if were to really move.

True, but it can walk, as the feet can rotate, because it's on a 3x3 'dome' with a stud.

I'll try the turret thing, as I already have 2 AT-RTs serving as walkers.

darth yoda wrote:Pd, unless Alpha is making a stopmotion it's fine. A certain pose can be portrayed with something that wouldn't work if were to really move.

But it doesn't look like a walker. I mean, at least put some knee joints in there.

Fine, updated.

Nice

Gives it a "Run for your life " feeling to those facing it


Please edit your post(s) and use proper spelling, grammar, spacing, capitalization, & punctuation. Thanks. ADMIN

Read this before posting again. https://cabg.forumotion.com/the-guild-constitution-f1/the-constitution-t1.htm#1 ADMIN

I can tell where you got your insparation from... It does look kinda like a turret with those feet, if you gave it more BP-like feet it would look more like a walker.

Personally i think this is a great design, mainly because you could use it as a walker or a turret. Good job!

Nice design, but I'm not sure about the angle of the legs...

Meh. I still say its a crap walker.

But if you gave it the BP feet it would almost look like the CP itself?

It's a good design Alpha just I would make the cockpit a bit wider. The legs look alright just try to angle them better.

It reminds me a lot of the Bpack walkers. Nice!

It's too blocky. The sides are just slants going upward, fix it a bit.

Alpha wrote:
Firstly, it's too blocky. The sides are just slants going upward, fix it a bit.

Zepher wrote:It's too blocky. The sides are just slants going upward, fix it a bit.

Epic lulz for everyone.

Roflcopterz. That's flippin' hilarious. And ironic too...

Not quite ironic, Zepher's is a speeder, mine is a walker.

A walker doesn't require smooth slopes. It moves slowly.

A speeder has to be sleek, or it'll be slowed down, and won't even look good.

I wanted someoneelse to catch it, not you Alpha! You should of seen if anyone else could!

Probaly not come to think of it.

In all seriousness though, I'm impressed this thing is able to stand. It sure doesn't look like it should be able too. I think the trooper area is too large compared to the legs, and looks like it has too much over hang in the front. Maybe make it more veritcal and less long. Walkers are also meant to be closed in my thoughs, or more just legs, not anything in btween. THere's something I just don't like about this, but I've seen much worse from people. A so-so MOC in my thoughts.

So, walkers like the AT-TE, AT-AP, AT-RT, and almost every walker isn't allowed to have a gap between the legs?

I'll scrap this, and make some larger walker. I'll be building all afternoon, so bye for now.

The leg distance isn't what I meant. I meant the area where the clones sat was to long. As in from front to back, not the two legs.