212th F4-1L Vic Viper

Meh, not my best, but still pretty good IMO.





C&C welcome.

I think this was a really well done ship. I love the details and angles. This is probably, in my opinion one of your top 3 MOCs! Great job!

Fabulous. Portal nomination without a doubt.

Woah Tac, that is amazing. Excellent work.

Is it a space vehicle or land? It's very cool, but those flap-like things in the middle makes me wonder what use it has.

This is a really great ship. I don't have any real problem with it, so excellent work yet again Tac.

Love the name and I absolutely love the angles on the MOC

Please edit your post(s) and use proper spelling, grammar, spacing, capitalization, & punctuation. Thanks. ADMIN --R

Read this before posting again. http://www.thecabg.net/the-guild-constitution-f1/the-constitution-t1.htm#1 ADMIN --R

I really like the way you made the front of the ship!

Wow that thing is sweet. The angles are great, and just wow. You got my vote for moc of the month.

Yea yea I'm gonna be negative here again.


It's too busy, it would be better with a nice sleek look.

Jens wrote:Yea yea I'm gonna be negative here again.


It's too busy, it would be better with a nice sleek look.

Aye, this be a funky looking ship IMO, but it's still amazing.

I think I'm in love. I guess I just like my ships chuncky.

Good lord that's a fine ship! The design and detail is phenomenal, Great work Tac!

Design is excellent, though there's too much going on/needs to be smoother.

It has an epic amount of detail and design but...I think the problem here is that it's either not big enough for the front or the front should be smaller. Also, to be honest it doesn't really look like something that would fly. But it's still a nice build.

I'd say you went a little overboard with the SNOT, but it still looks fantastic! The original design of the ship is outstanding, great architecture too. That kind of ship would be frustrating to build to most people.

I wonder how many times you went over the design.

Thanks for all the C&C guys! IMO there are two types of fighters, sleek and smooth and chunky and greebly. I personally prefer building the latter.

Sergeant Macaroni wrote:I'd say you went a little overboard with the SNOT, but it still looks fantastic! The original design of the ship is outstanding, great architecture too. That kind of ship would be frustrating to build to most people.

I wonder how many times you went over the design.

Once.

I started with the front, came up with the X'd plate idea, made the cockpit then stuck on an engine I'd been working on.

All in all it took me around 1 and a half hours to build it.

really good, to me it is sleek and and almost studless....
an impossible build for me

Please edit your post(s) and use proper spelling, grammar, spacing, capitalization, & punctuation. Thanks. ADMIN --R

Read this before posting again. https://cabg.forumotion.com/the-guild-constitution-f1/the-constitution-t1.htm#1 ADMIN --R

I just noticed something! If you think of the numbers as letters, it spells out FAIL! Really good starfighter, by the way. Loving the SNOT, and parts usage in the back.

TheMissingPiece wrote:I just noticed something! If you think of the numbers as letters, it spells out FAIL!

NO WAY! :O

DID ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THAT?! BECAUSE I DIDN'T!!


<.<

>.>


Oh and it needs a pilot.

Jens wrote:Oh and it needs a pilot.

I've already BL'd the pilot pieces, I just need them to come.

darn.

That thing is pretty freaking epic.

Great job, can't wait to see what's next!!

Read this before posting again. https://cabg.forumotion.com/the-guild-constitution-f1/the-constitution-t1.htm#1 ADMIN --R

Thats a nice ship it looks like it could pierce right through a droid cruiser and come back alive.