83rd Legion

Thunder-blade wrote:We aren't trying to make you feel bad... it's just, we like to keep things as Canon as possible...

Even though we make up our own legions, vehicles, Jedi, battles, and starships...

Oh, I unterstand... I'll be adding more stuff later.

Funny "IMPERIAL" dropship. I think that you should edit your legion. This is the CABG not the IABG or the DABG or the NABG.

Rook wrote:Funny "IMPERIAL" dropship. I think that you should edit your legion. This is the CABG not the IABG or the DABG or the NABG.

Imperial dropship deleted! New announcment! Legion colors: YELLOW

Did you have two AT-APs or did you scrap your current one to create that armoured transport?

Rook wrote:Funny "IMPERIAL" dropship. I think that you should edit your legion. This is the CABG not the IABG or the DABG or the NABG.

Ha ha...

Or the ICSABG(Imperial Crap Ship army builders guild ).

Wait... what's NABG??

What could that stand for??

Pardon my ignorance in advance...

No Army Builders Guild. xD

Oh....

PFFFFT!!!

I should have thought of that!!

Thunder-blade wrote:Wait... what's NABG??

What could that stand for??

Pardon my ignorance in advance...

Heh heh... Or n00b army builders guild...

Hmm. I was eyeballing that last vehicle and I was like, 'Woah that's the best representation of this member's MOC'ing ability so far!' And then I saw it was just a modified AT-AP cabin.

Clonecommando007 wrote:Hmm. I was eyeballing that last vehicle and I was like, 'Woah that's the best representation of this member's MOC'ing ability so far!' And then I saw it was just a modified AT-AP cabin.

Well that's pretty obvious.

That it's the cabin, that is. The two hatches, the 'eyes' of the AT-AP have to go. Some facets of this are OK. I'd like to know how it moves around.

Maybe give it a tread system with the treads from the Tie Crawler? That would make it a bit more interesting, if you do the treads right.

CommandoEighty-Oh wrote:

Clonecommando007 wrote:Hmm. I was eyeballing that last vehicle and I was like, 'Woah that's the best representation of this member's MOC'ing ability so far!' And then I saw it was just a modified AT-AP cabin.

Well that's pretty obvious.

That it's the cabin, that is. The two hatches, the 'eyes' of the AT-AP have to go. Some facets of this are OK. I'd like to know how it moves around.

Maybe give it a tread system with the treads from the Tie Crawler? That would make it a bit more interesting, if you do the treads right.

Allow me to tell you about that vehicle. It is an "HA-TT", and is made for troop transportation... and it will be edited. Soon. I hope...

80-0, I will take your idea into consideration. Even thogh the HA-TT is made for flying.

@ CC007: And the TX-130 isn't?

Well, the TX-130 is a little colorblind.

If it's made for flying how does it fit all the clones you picture in your latest post?

CommandoEighty-Oh wrote:Well, the TX-130 is a little colorblind.

If it's made for flying how does it fit all the clones you picture in your latest post?

It took two trips...

cln-cmndo wrote:

CommandoEighty-Oh wrote:Well, the TX-130 is a little colorblind.

If it's made for flying how does it fit all the clones you picture in your latest post?

It took two trips...

Fail Number 1: Clone ships are built for excellence, and they don't waste things like fuel. So make it more shuttle like.

Fail Number 2: FIVE WORDS!

It took two trips?

Besides... there are other vehicles there, they just aren't shown... (that's a good excuse!)

great clones, but the action figure helmet was a bad idea.
But anyway, awesome flagship!